Compare
HealthOS vs AlayaCare
Home and community care platform with international footprint
Aged careNDIS
AlayaCare pricing
Per-user or organisation quote; module-based
HealthOS pricing
Published per program on /pricing. Pay only for programs you enable; bundle discounts with two or three programs.
Honest read
Strengths and typical gaps
We respect incumbents — this is a buyer's checklist, not a hit piece.
Where AlayaCare is strong
- Home care scheduling and care plan workflows
- Scales across regions and franchise-style groups
- Open API ecosystem for integrations
Where teams look elsewhere
- Australian MAC, CHSP DEX, and SIRS nuance may need configuration
- NDIS PACE depth and SCHADS payroll are not always turnkey
- Allied health MBS/DVA billing is outside core home-care positioning
- Total cost of ownership can grow with modules and services
Side by side
Feature comparison
| Capability | AlayaCare | HealthOS |
|---|---|---|
| Home care scheduling | Strong | Roster + AI draft + shift board |
| AU aged care compliance | Configurable | Quality Standards + SIRS native |
| NDIS claiming | Module-dependent | PACE/PRODA + plan management |
| Allied health practice | Not core | Encrypted notes + MBS/DVA |
| Family portal | Available | Person portal + granular rep permissions |
| Pricing transparency | Quote-led | Published program pricing |
| AU data residency | Confirm with vendor | Documented ap-southeast-2/4 |
| Forms library | Templates vary | 36+ built-in operational forms |
Why providers switch
AlayaCare is often shortlisted for multi-region home care groups. HealthOS is built for Australian funding rules first — NDIS, aged care, and allied health on one record — with local hosting and published bundle discounts.